Cases 41 - 50 of 576
WILLIAMS v. DUFF et al
as 1:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE A. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
L. DUFF, DR. W. HAQ, T. O'LEARY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. RICHMOND COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
JIMMY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RICHMOND COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Kelly
as 5:2022ct03459
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kunlay Williams
Defendant:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MUSGROVE v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2022cv01125
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, KATE POOLE, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, TODD ISHEE, BRADESHAWN HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORR. INST., RITHIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DUFF et al
as 1:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE ALEXANDER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DETENTION OFFICER DUFF, RAY and DR. W. HAQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaKemper v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Cobey LaKemper
Defendant:
FNU Honeycutt, FNU Young, Russell Chester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. WOODS et al
as 1:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WILLIAM MITCHELL
Defendant:
LEUENANT WOODS, SGT. COMITO, LEUTENANT ROUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
