Cases 51 - 60 of 608
Garrett v. Davis et al
as 4:2020cv03328
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, C. Tatsch, Capt. Goodall and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesmith v. Davis et al
as 3:2020cv00298
Defendant:
University Of Texas Medical Branch, Dr. Henderson, Dr. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Nesmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merryman v. Davis et al
as 1:2020cv00392
Defendant:
Aaron Thompkins, FNU Brown and Lorie Davis
Plaintiff:
Bruce R Merryman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton et al v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv03274
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Jeffery Richardson, Brian Collier and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Wyatt, Mark Owens, Lee Charles Hamilton and others
Petitioner:
Oliver E. Lister, II, Charles O'Malley, Deshaun R Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv03228
Plaintiff:
Leslie Jones
Defendant:
Dir of TDCJ-Parole Bryan Collier, Director of TDCJ CID Lorie Davis, Asst. Warden Kent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Collier et al
as 4:2020cv03266
Defendant:
A. Correll, Oscar Mendoza, Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rocha v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 5:2020cv01115
Defendant:
Phonso Rayford, Lorie Davis, Frank Stengel and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Rocha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abraham v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Johnny Webb, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Jimmy Webb and others
Plaintiff:
Jestine Abraham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Criswell et al v. Davis et al
as 4:2020cv03108
Plaintiff:
Frank Brown and Joshua Lee Criswell
Defendant:
Warden Kelly Strong, Bobby Lumpkin and Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Davis
as 9:2020cv00192
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Hill
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
