Cases 71 - 80 of 173
Rountree v. State of Georgia
as 4:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Larry Archie Roundtree
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shon Miller, Sr. v. Burl Cain, Warden, et al
as 15-30105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHON D. MILLER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, BRUCE DODD, Warden, KENNETH NORRIS, Warden and others
Davenport v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00795
Defendant:
Aurielle Boeker, Burl Cain, Jason Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Davis v. Jonathan Roundtree, et al
as 14-31135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN ARLEN ROUNDTREE, KENNETH NORRIS and COLLINS, Doctor
Cormier v. Roundtree et al
as 3:2014cv00527
Plaintiff:
Tony Cormier
Defendant:
Dr. Jonathan Roundtree and Preety Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis Brauner v. Shirley Coody, et al
as 14-30801
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANCIS BRAUNER
Defendant - Appellant:
SHIRLEY COODY, Assistant Warden, KENNETH NORRIS, Assistant Warden, JONATHAN ROUNDTREE, Medical Doctor and others
Wade Jackson v. Jason Collins, et al
as 14-30554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE P. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. JASON COLLINS, DR. JONATHAN ROUNDTREE, DR. UNKNOWN BARKMEYER and others
Sean Monroe v. Burl Cain, Warden, et al
as 14-30520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN MONROE
Defendant - Appellee:
N. BURL CAIN, Warden, KENNETH NORRIS, Assistant Warden and JONATHAN ROUNDTREE, Medical Doctor
Jackson v. Collins et al
as 3:2014cv00275
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Barkmeyer, Burl Cain, Unknown Cashio and others
Plaintiff:
Wade P. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Partington et al
as 3:2014cv00360
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Jackson
Defendant:
Abe Partington, NFN Coleman, NFN Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
