Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Hill v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Roy Devon Hill
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Pat Labat, Lenwood Cochran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochran et al v. Labat et al
as 1:2023cv03773
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Sheriff Patrick Labat, Officer Reid Thornton, Officer K. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. MILLER et al
as 5:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS LEROY BALL
Defendant:
JUDGE B JR MILLER, SHERIFF DAN KILGORE, LT HEATH EPPINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oteo v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv03266
Plaintiff:
Bloane Oteo, Swift Bey Empire Trust and Blaane Oteo
Defendant:
United States, Social Security Administration, Denver Dept. of Public Heath & Environment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. United States
as 1:2020cv03454
Defendant:
United States
Plaintiff:
Shanequil Nicole Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00132
Defendant:
JOAN HEATH, FRYE and GREGORY C DOZIER
Plaintiff:
JAMON DEMETRIUS JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath v. Perry et al
as 1:2019cv02137
Defendant:
Clinton Perry and Timothy Sales
Plaintiff:
Kendrick D. Heath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. PERRY et al
as 5:2019cv00188
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES and WARDEN CLINTON PERRY
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK D HEATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dozier et al
as 1:2019cv00506
Defendant:
Gregory C. Dozier, Dr. Frye and Joan Heath
Plaintiff:
Jamon Demetrius Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Correct Heath Inc., Sheriff John T. Wilcher, Ofc. J. Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Leontae V. Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
