Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Poole v. Hurwitz et al
as 6:2023cv06927
Plaintiff:
Leo Vincent Poole
Defendant:
Hugh J Hurwitz, Director J Gordon and Jack J Joiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Pendarvis v. Wilson et al
as 2:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
John Trenton Pendarvis
Defendant:
Alan M. Wilson, Mark A. Keel, Hugh E. Weathers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Kennedy v. Hughes et al
as 4:2022cv01867
Plaintiff:
Jamar Kennedy and Jamar A. Kennedy
Defendant:
Sheldon Hughes, Cpt. Sumter, Lt. Julius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kennedy v. Hughes et al
as 2:2022cv01867
Plaintiff:
Jamar Kennedy
Defendant:
Sheldon Hughes, Cpt. Sumter, Lt. Julius and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CROCKETT v. HURWITZ
as 6:2020cv04335
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, John Doe, 3, Hugh Hurwitz and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dale Crockett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 6:2020cv03294
Defendant:
Shelton L Hughes, Jr and Major Robert D Kelly
Plaintiff:
Khammesherma Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Wilson et al
as 3:2020cv02479
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas, Dr. Assa and Dr. Faltas
Defendant:
John H. Strom, Dinah Gail Steele, Hugh Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mazyck v. Robinson et al
as 1:2020cv02126
Defendant:
National Legal Professional Associates, Ms. Susan Troutt, Ms. Margaret A. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Jamin Mazyck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services et al
as 6:2019cv03430
Respondent:
Officer Joshua Tankersley, Agent Tim Thurst, Agent Tyler Chase and others
Petitioner:
Cassandra Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gardner v. Horowitz et al
as 5:2019cv02616
Defendant:
Sean Janson, Hugh Horowitz and Nanada Nicole Middleton
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel J Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
