Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Brown v. Farrell et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Brown
Defendant:
Paul T. Farrell, Tim Armstead, Elizabeth D. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staples, Bey v. Childress et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Don Juan Staples, Bey
Defendant:
H. Childress, Matt Hill, Officer Daber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Damron v. Rays et al
as 3:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Thomas Damron
Defendant:
H. Rays, A. Messenger, Oslin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Friedman v. Massile et al
as 2:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jerome H. Friedman, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Jacob Massile, Mr. Francis, Attorney Larry Harrah, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kessler v. Lewis et al
as 5:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Kessler, III
Defendant:
Cornelius Russell Lewis, Gold Quality Foods, Cpl. N. J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reyes v. Lovett et al
as 5:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Reyes
Defendant:
S. Lovett, H. Ray, D. Burnisky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Myles v. Hong et al
as 3:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Myles, Jr.
Defendant:
Chaplain Y. Hong, D. Husk, C.O. D. Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jones
Defendant:
Lt. Jenkins, C. Ord, H. Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jones
Defendant:
Lt. Jenkins, H. Burkett, C. Ord and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mays v. Saad et al
as 3:2020cv00199
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Ian Connors, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Randolph Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
