Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant:
Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. Adams et al
as 7:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Counselor P. Adams and Major Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. Robinson
as 3:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
A. David Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. Red Onion State Prison
as 7:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Red Onion State Prison and D.O.C./Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moultrie v. Smith
as 7:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Happy Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chisolm v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv03506
Plaintiff:
Don Survi Chisolm and Don-Survi Chisolm
Defendant:
Associate Warden Timothy Clark, Chaplain Moultrie, Brian Sterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moultrie v. Wright
as 1:2021cv03925
Defendant:
Parole Officer Wright
Plaintiff:
Mukadien Moultre and Mukadien Moultrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
Catchings et al v. Wilson et al
as 1:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
Sedric Tavon Catchings, Joseph Windsor Speed, Allen Lamin and others
Defendant:
Calvin Wilson and Robert L. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bridgeford v. Moultrie et al
as 8:2020cv02691
Defendant:
Dr. Moultrie, M. Peters and Pharmacy Tech Ike
Plaintiff:
Douglass Bridgeford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moultrie v. Kings County Hospital et al
as 1:2020cv01823
Defendant:
Kings County Hospital, Psychiatric Part. Pyschiatrist Doctor, John Doe Psychatrist Doctor at Kings County Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Mukadien Moultrie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
