Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Bennett v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Cortez Bennett
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. T-Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Bennett
Defendant:
T-Department of Corrections, f/n/u Hedge, Tracy Tomlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Bedford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Bennett
Defendant:
Bedford County, Tennessee, Chad Graham, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Coffee et al
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Lee Vester Coffee, Aurthur Thomas Bennett, Gwendolyn Rooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Hoss et al
as 2:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Bennett
Defendant:
Graybeal, Higgins, Hoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clinton v. Pressley et al
as 3:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Clinton
Defendant:
Mark Douglas Pressley, Southern Health Partners, Mark A. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. Prasser et al
as 3:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Joshua Prasser, David Hardwin, f/n/u Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClellon v. Bennett et al
as 2:2020cv00015
Plaintiff:
Sandy Leander McClellon
Defendant:
Bennett, Casey Cox, Quality Correctional Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClellon v. Bennett et al
as 3:2020cv00077
Plaintiff:
Sandy Leander McClellon
Defendant:
Bennett, Casey Cox, Quality Correctional Health Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins et al v. Wise
as 3:2020cv00036
Plaintiff:
Trejuan Robbins and Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Lt. David Wise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
