Cases 1 - 10 of 274
Terry v. Elgin et al
as 3:2022cv00797
Plaintiff:
James Michael Terry and James Michael Terry, Jr.
Defendant:
C. L. Elgin and Dan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Daub et al
as 3:2022cv01667
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Williams
Defendant:
C. L. Daub, C. Edwards, Beltran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowan v. Heick et al
as 1:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
George C. L. Rowan
Defendant:
Sgt. Heick, Lori Wright, Joan Lee and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Minor et al
as 4:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W Russell
Defendant:
Officer C L Minor and Officer McCloud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simms v. Strong et al
as 4:2021cv01242
Defendant:
Assistant Warden C. L. Cox, Warden K Strong and Ellis Unit Mail Room Department
Plaintiff:
Amos Lott Simms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Ryan et al
as 4:2020cv08223
Defendant:
Sherri R. Carter, Tamarah Huber-Pickens, B. Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Ervine et al
as 4:2020cv07971
Defendant:
B. Seals, Charles H. Ervine, Tusha Bucklii and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. Minor et al
as 4:2020cv01238
Defendant:
McCloud and C. L. Minor
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayde Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Person v. Davis et al
as 7:2020cv00146
Defendant:
J. S. Harrison, C. L. Parr, C. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowan v. O.C.C.C. Warden et al
as 1:2020cv00080
Plaintiff:
George C. L. Rowan
Defendant:
O.C.C.C. Warden and D.P.S. Director
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
