Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Gordon v. Watson et al
as 1:2022cv04704
Plaintiff:
Rubin Gordon
Defendant:
Officer Charles Watson, Investigator Thomas and Atlanta Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Kennar
as 1:2022cv04611
Plaintiff:
Rubin J. Gordon
Defendant:
Maurice Kennar
Consolidated Defendant:
Officer Charles Watson, Investigator Thomas and Atlanta Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Moore et al
as 4:2020cv02485
Defendant:
Kate E. Christopher, Lannette Linthicum, Rocky Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Charles Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Riverdale Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv06771
Plaintiff:
Jamell DeShaune Charles Watson
Defendant:
Riverdale Police Department, Police Officer Jordan and Riverdale Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Koenigsmann et al
as 1:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Charles Watson
Defendant:
Koenigsmann, Stallone, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Jackson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2013cv11523
Plaintiff:
Charles Watson
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff's Department, Schuette, Tinklepaugh and others
Watson v. Carver-Jordan
as 12-306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Watson
Defendant - Appellee:
R. Joyce Carver-Jordan, Former Director, Inmate Movement, Department of Correctional Services, Douglas Bostford, Director, Inmate Movement, Department of Correctional Services, R. Cunningham, Deputy Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional Facility and others
Watson v. Wright
as 11-4308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Watson
Defendant:
Ronald Moscicki, Superintendent, Lakeview Correctional Facility, R. Moffit, DSA, Lakeview Correctional Facility, Caissley, Facility Health Services Director, Lakeview Correctional Facility and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Lester N. Wright, Department of Correctional Service, Chief Medical Officer and Azevedo Doyon, FHSD, Clinton Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
