Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Craig Alford v. Baylor, et al
as 23-2987
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. BAYLOR, Director of Monroe County Correctional Facility, GARY HAIDLE, Warden of Monroe County Correctional Facility, MR. ARMOND, Sgt. at Monroe County Correctional Facility and others
Craig Alford v. Baylor, et al
as 23-1513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. BAYLOR, Director of Monroe County Correctional Facility, GARY HAIDLE, Warden of Monroe County Correctional Facility and MR. ARMOND, Sgt. at Monroe County Correctional Facility
Lora et al v. Baylor et al
as 1:2020cv01787
Plaintiff:
Justin Coate, Howard Wolfe, Jhon Lora and others
Defendant:
Lt. Baylor, George Warden, Mr. Armond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alford v. Hodle et al
as 1:2020cv01427
Defendant:
Garry Hodle, Monroe County Jail, Mail Clerk and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Alford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD v. WISENHOWER et al
as 1:2017cv06259
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
WISENHOWER, TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY HALL OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD v. POTTIEGER et al
as 2:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
MICHAEL POTTIEGER, CHARLES A. ECKERT, LEONARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD et al v. WOJCHIECHOWICZ et al
as 3:2015cv06750
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
BO ROBINSON PSYCHOLOGIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2015cv03484
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, MERCER COUNTY JAIL and RAYA-SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Alford v. Laquise
as 14-3350
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
LAQUISE, Hearing Examiner, DORINA VARNER, Chief Hearing Examiner, JOHN WETZEL and others
Alford v. Munley et al
as 1:2014cv00921
Plaintiff:
Craig Alford
Defendant:
James Munley, Thomas Blewitt and Karoline Mehalchick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
