Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Demetrius McBride v. Bienvenido Canlas, et al
as 24-1114
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS MCBRIDE and DEMETRIUS DARNELL MCBRIDE
Defendant:
BIENVENIDO CANLAS, MD, CHRISTI M. CORPE, RN, CARMEN MCINTYRE, Medical Director of Prisons and others
McBride #192829 v. Canlas et al
as 2:2020cv00212
Plaintiff:
Demetrius McBride #192829
Defendant:
Christi Corpe, Bienvenido B. Canlas, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride v. Canlas et al
as 5:2020cv12611
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc., Bienvenido B. Canlas, Christi M. Corpe and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius McBride
Lindsey v. Houston Police Dep. et al
as 4:2019cv04638
Defendant:
Judge Phil Grant, Philp Teissier, Richard Martin P. Canlas and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sekerke v. Leo et al
as 3:2019cv00034
Plaintiff:
Keith Wayne Sekerke
Defendant:
Canlas Avelino, Vincente Gatan, Arturo Leo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ford v. Steward et al
as 2:2018cv12809
Defendant:
Charles Jamsen, Bienvenido Canlas, Anthony Steward and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ford
Jones v. Trinity Food Service Group et al
as 2:2018cv11116
Plaintiff:
Tremain Vernon Jones
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service Group, Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Flynn v. Canlas et al
as 3:2015cv02115
Plaintiff:
David Flynn
Defendant:
Canlas, MD, D. Maddox, FNP, N. Malakkla, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nava v. Velardi et al
as 3:2015cv01156
Plaintiff:
Fabian Nava
Defendant:
P. Velardi, J. Silva, M.D., Avelino Canlas, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Sleeley et al
as 3:2014cv01525
Plaintiff:
Ruben Dario Garcia, Jr
Defendant:
Sleeley, A. Canlas, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
