Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director Department of Corrections
as 24-6341
Petitioner:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Respondent:
DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kenneth Newkirk v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 24-6336
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Newkirk v. Director, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Director, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6057
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director Department of Corrections
Hoak v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Larry M Hoak
Defendant:
Tyrell Davis, Rebeka Haggard, Sumer Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Burt v. Eddie Pearson
as 18-6265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL LEIGH BURT
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE PEARSON, Lead Warden, HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections and DAWEN BU, M.D., Neuro Care of Virginia
Marvin Harris v. Vaughn Walker, et al
as 17-17398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
VAUGHN R. WALKER, Administrative Law Judge, USDC Judge, S. COMMANDER, C.O., F. LOGEFEIL, C.O. and others
Marvin Harris, et al v. Charles Marshall, et al
as 17-17372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN HARRIS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES D. MARSHALL, Warden, T. J. STEELE, JAMES GOMEZ, Director Department of Corrections and others
Kenneth White v. Ron Stovall, et al
as 16-4062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth White
Defendant - Appellee:
Ron Stovall, Sheriff, Miller County, Wendy Kelley, ADC Director, Department of Correction, Lee Ann Jones, Arkansas Board of Parole and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
