Cases 1 - 10 of 158
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isaak v. Forsythe
as 3:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Boe Dean Isaak
Defendant:
David W Forsythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Victor L Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Angel Quiros, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borrero v. Colen
as 3:2023cv01550
Plaintiff:
Christian Borrero
Defendant:
David Colen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkman v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 3:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
David W. Burkman
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Michael D. Carvajal, Kevin Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hajati v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
George Hajati
Defendant:
United States Of America, Williams Barr, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scott Erfe, WIlliam Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
Melvin Frank Sherman, III
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Retamar v. Bonetti et al
as 3:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
David Retamar
Defendant:
Robert W. Bonetti, Akina Richards, Hollie Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowan v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Vernon L. Cowan, Jr.
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Roger Bowles, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
