Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Love v. Flowers et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Defendant:
Brandon S. Flowers A.U.S.A., F.C.I Hazelton Warden Rey, F.C.I. Hazelton S.I.S. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Love v. Flowers et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jerry Dean Love
Respondent:
A.U.S.A. Brandon S. Flowers and U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of West Virginia at Clarksburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Skaggs v. Hoke et al
as 2:2023cv00759
Petitioner:
Shelby Dean Skaggs
Respondent:
Jay M. Hoke, Victor Navy, T. M. Divita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dean v. Ray et al
as 5:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Mrs. Ray and Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dean v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dean v. Mrs. Brown, et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Warden Mrs. Brown, Counselor, Case Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Hudgins
as 5:2021cv00064
Respondent:
R. Hudgins
Petitioner:
Dean Anthony Ronelle Bailey and Deon Anthony Ronelle Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Skaggs v. Maston et al
as 3:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Wexford Health Resources, Carla Deem, Dr. James Beane and others
Plaintiff:
Shelby Dean Skaggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clinton v. Riley
as 3:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
Gregory Keith Clinton
Defendant:
Cheryl Dean Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
