Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jimmy Kroft v. Derek Snider, et al
as 23-11205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY LEE KROFT
Defendant / Appellee:
DEREK SNIDER, FNU DAWSON, JEFFREY ROBINSON and others
Jimmy Kroft v. Charlotte CI Warden, et al
as 23-11168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JIMMY LEE KROFT
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLOTTE CI WARDEN, JEFFREY ROBINSON, FNU DAWSON and others
Davis v. Ansari, et al
as 23-6040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EZEKIEL DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SHADID ANSARI, GEO/LCF Medical Director, individually and in his official capacity, GEO GROUP CORRECTIONS, INC., AMBER MARTIN, Vice President of GEO Group, Inc., individually and in her official capacity and others
Kroft v. Snider et al
as 2:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Kroft
Defendant:
Derek Snider, Jeffrey Robinson, FNU Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kroft v Snider et al
as 2:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Kroft
Defendant:
Derek Snider, FNU Dawson, Jeffrey Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-X v. Hyle et al
as 1:2021cv00201
Defendant:
D Feather, FNU Parks, D Dobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Antonius El-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. State Of Texas et al
as 6:2019cv00243
Defendant:
Judge FNU Harris, Judge FNU Schewski, Judge FNU Jetser and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. State Of Texas et al
as 6:2019cv00252
Defendant:
Judge FNU Harris, Judge FNU Schewski, Judge FNU Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Gallegos et al
as 1:2019cv00128
Defendant:
FNU Dawson, Mark Gallegos and Curry County Adult Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2018cv00090
Defendant:
Weber County, Davis County, FNU Dawson and others
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Shane R. Carl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
