Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Charlie Hardin v. Elizabeth Peake
as 23-6308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCOTLAND, OFFICER WILEY and others
Crump v. Carver et al
as 3:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Ramar Dion Benjamin Crump
Defendant:
Ben Carver, Saint T. Tapp, David E. Cothron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Todd Ishee
as 22-7084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, KENNETH E. LASSITER, EDDIE THOMAS and others
Abdu-Salim Gould v. Todd Ishee
as 22-7066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDU-SALIM GOULD, a/k/a Salim Abdu Gould, a/k/a Salimabdu Gould
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, KENNETH E. LASSITER, EDDIE THOMAS and others
HARDIN v. PEAKE et al
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, OFFICER WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LYLES v. POOLE et al
as 1:2020cv00068
Defendant:
PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR and KATY POOLE
Plaintiff:
HILDRED MANUEL LYLES, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANDYKE v. LASSITER et al
as 1:2019cv01074
Defendant:
ERIK A. HOOKS, KENNETH E. LASSITER and KATY POOLE
Plaintiff:
LARRY J. VANDYKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyles v. Poole et al
as 5:2019ct03255
Defendant:
Pamela J. Locklear and Katy Poole
Plaintiff:
Hildred Manuel Lyles, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Thompson et al
as 5:2018ct03336
Plaintiff:
Joseph Earl Clark, II
Defendant:
Dean Locklear, Caroline Riddick-Taylor, Horner M. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
