Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Clark v. Lt. Lovett et al
as 7:2024cv01221
Defendant:
Lt. Pelzer, Lt. Lovett and Lt. Griffen
Plaintiff:
Taylor Harlequin Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovett v. Gladson et al
as 6:2024cv01358
Defendant:
Kasey Jeanne Whitson and William M. Gladson
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Deon Lovett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Lovett et al
as 5:2024cv00140
Defendant:
John Doe, Shiek and S. Lovett
Plaintiff:
Nathen Earl Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lovett v. Gladson et al
as 6:2024cv01209
Defendant:
William M. Gladson and Kasey Jeanne Whitson
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Deon Lovett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Santoro, et al.
as 1:2024cv00572
Defendant:
M. Ayala, Lovett, K. Mixon and others
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lovett et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
William C. Brown
Defendant:
Warden Lovett and Dr. Gregory Mimms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lovett v. Lewis et al
as 8:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Deon Lovett
Defendant:
Donald Roberts Lewis and Stephen E. Toner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jalaal Abdullah v. Kelly Santoro et al
as 2:2024cv03139
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Ibn Abdullah
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro, John or Jane Doe, K. Mixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shah El v. DeKalb County et al
as 3:2024cv50135
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
DeKalb County, DeKalb County Sheriff's Office, Grant Ericson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick Lovett v. Donald Lewis, et al
as 24-10838
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK DEON LOVETT
Defendant:
DONALD ROBERTS LEWIS, STEPHEN E. TONER and UNKNOWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
