Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
GLADU v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS A GLADU
Defendant: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOES 1-3, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff: ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant: RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff: ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant: RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
GLADU v. MAGNUSSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS A GLADU
Defendant: MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, JAMES HANCOX, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLADU v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 1:2022cv00089
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS A GLADU
Defendant: MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, JAMES HANCOX, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILCOX v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 1:2021cv00305
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY T WILCOX
Defendant: MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, RANDALL LIBERTY and MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWAIN et al v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00449
Plaintiff: ROBERT CARROLL, ZACHARY SWAIN, ANTHONY HARDY and others
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Defendant: MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, AMANDA SEIRUP, ANTHONY CANTILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURR et al v. BOUFFARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00206
Defendant: KENNETH VIGUE, HAROLD ABBOTT, LYDIA BURNHAM and others
Plaintiff: REBBECCA BURR and DOUGLAS BURR
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. MAGNUSSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00547
Defendant: RANDALL LIBERTY, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, THOMAS AVERILL and others
Plaintiff: JON R ADAMS
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REICHERT v. ABBOTT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00240
Defendant: MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, RANDALL A LIBERTY, HAROLD D ABBOTT, JR and others
Plaintiff: ROBROY REICHERT
Not Yet Classified: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?