Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Paul McDonald v. Division of Corrections for MD
as 13-6647
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MR. PAUL B. MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee:
DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, CO II MICHEAL STAUFFER, At Time of infraction, in His Official and Individual Capacities, "ET AL", CO II BRIAN HAWK, At Time of infraction, in His Official and Individual Capacities, "ET AL" and others
McDonald v. Division of Corrections for the State of Maryland
as 8:2013cv00775
Plaintiff:
Paul B. McDonald
Defendant:
Division of Corrections for the State of Maryland, Micheal Stauffer, Brian Hawk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunn v. Parsons et al
as 8:2011cv01960
Plaintiff:
Eulista Dunn
Defendant:
Eric Parsons, Cody A. Reed, Andrew B Nave and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danny Conway v. Nancy Rouse
as 10-6996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY CONWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY ROUSE, J. MICHAEL STOUFFEL, J. DIEHL and others
Michael Bruno v. Tony Nery
as 10-6946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRUNO
Defendant - Appellee:
TONY V. NERY, Officer CO II, BRIAN SMITH, Lt., DAY HOFF, Lt. and others
Benjamin Davis v. Nancy Rouse
as 09-8265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY ROUSE, Official/Personal Capacity and J. HARSH, CO II, Official/Personal Capacity
Bruno v. Nery et al
as 1:2009cv03086
Plaintiff:
Michael Bruno
Defendant:
Tony V. Nery, Brian Smith, Day Hoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway v. Rouse et al
as 1:2009cv00514
Plaintiff:
Danny Conway
Defendant:
Nancy Rouse, J. Michael Stouffel, J. Diehl and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Rouse
as 8:2008cv03266
Plaintiff:
Bryant Z. Davis
Defendant:
Nancy Rouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Rouse et al
as 1:2008cv03106
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Davis
Defendant:
Nancy Rouse and J. Harsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
