Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Prather v. Christian
as 6:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Natalie Prather
Defendant:
John Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Pemberton et al
as 3:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Evan Rollins
Defendant:
Pemberton, Imlay, Prather and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Verdon et al
as 3:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Evan Rollins
Defendant:
Verdon, Pupko, Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANLEY v. WHITENTIN et al
as 5:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
ALVIN GAMAR STANLEY
Defendant:
WARDEN WHITENTIN, WARDEN BARNETT, WARDEN SPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Wood
as 3:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Tyler Prather
Defendant:
Sheriff Lenn Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Tyler J. Prather
Defendant:
CCSO Officer 341 Smith, Officer Izzo, Captain Hems and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Conroe Police Department
as 4:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Prentise Emmanuel Prather
Defendant:
Conroe Police Department and City of Conroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Conroe Police Department Officers et al
as 4:2021cv00884
Defendant:
Patti Maginnis, William Pattillo and Conroe Police Department Officers
Plaintiff:
Prentice Emmanuel Prather and Prentise Emmanuel Prather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
