Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MacDonald et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, AJ, BM and others
Defendant:
Daniel Johnson, Bruce Kile, Bar Counsel Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taebel v. Swift
as 2:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Taebel and Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Taylor Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald v. Duddy et al
as 3:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
Kinley MacDonald, Kinley Mary Angela MacDonald, Mary Angela MacDonald and others
Defendant:
Michael Duddy, LouAnn Sulton, Robert Mulhern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez et al v. The People
as 3:2020cv00041
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Antonio Lopez, Jr, Taylor A Swift and Rudy A Lopez
Defendant:
The People
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift v. Sayulita Fine Foods
as 3:2019cv01161
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Sayulita Fine Foods
Plaintiff:
David A Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWIFT v. BURGESS et al
as 1:2019cv02354
Defendant:
DUANE BURGESS and JOHNSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift v. Boussard et al
as 3:2019cv00272
Defendant:
Tabler, Boussard and Sewell
Plaintiff:
Benny Carl Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AL-KASSAR v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al.
as 2:2018cv00086
Defendant:
AMY ADAMS, BUREAU OF PRISONS, N. COLE and others
Plaintiff:
MONZER AL-KASSAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
WILLIAMS v. SIEREVELD et al
as 2:2016cv00032
Defendant:
V. RIGSBY, KATHERINE SIEREVELD, CLINT SWIFT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COLEMAN v MARBERRY et al
as 2:2011cv00261
Defendant:
DEBBIE BURTON, DEBBIE BURTON, ROBERT ERWIN and others
Plaintiff:
MONROE L. COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
