Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Underwood v. Sayre et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Owen Underwood
Defendant:
D. T. Sayre, N. G. Elbon, T. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abreu v. Bruen et al
as 6:2017cv06394
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Kevin Bruen, Nancy J. Heywood, John C. Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Overbaugh et al
as 9:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael Simpson
Defendant:
Michael Overbaugh, Raymond Catina, Vincent Cuda, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spivey II v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv00276
Plaintiff:
William Owen Spivey II
Defendant:
C.O. Smith and C.O. Lindenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spivey II v. Harrington et al
as 3:2013cv00244
Plaintiff:
William Owen Spivey II
Defendant:
C/O Harrington, C/O Hoffman, Angela Grott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spivey II v. Nwaobasi et al
as 3:2013cv00245
Plaintiff:
William Owen Spivey II
Defendant:
Dr Nwaobasi, Dr Shepard, Nurse Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spivey v. Benton et al
as 3:2013cv03055
Plaintiff:
William Owen Spivey, II
Defendant:
Sherry Benton, J Parrack, James Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spivey v. Horner
as 3:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
Williams Owen Spivey
Defendant:
Howard Scott Horner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NIBLACK v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2010cv01824
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, LARRY GLOVER, BRUCE SAPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIBLACK et al v. HAYMAN, et al
as 2:2009cv03944
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK, RILEY WALKER, EUGENE WILSON and others
Defendant:
GEORGE HAYMAN, ROBERT PATERSON, NORTHERN STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
