Cases 101 - 110 of 164
HAYES v. ORANGE COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2015cv00677
Plaintiff:
HERBERT D. HAYES
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. ORANGE COUNTY JAIL SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
LELAND K. EDWARDS
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY JAIL SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BOLTEN, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aponte v. Orange County Corrections
as 6:2014cv01686
Plaintiff:
Roy Aponte
Defendant:
Orange County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Cuzback et al
as 1:2014cv07887
Plaintiff:
James Earl Evans
Defendant:
Vincent J Cuzback and Classification Department of Orange County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mejia v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2014cv07681
Plaintiff:
Roberto Soto Mejia
Defendant:
United States Of America, Orange County Jail, F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Armark Food and Commissary Services of the Orange County Corr. Facility
as 1:2014cv07498
Plaintiff:
Ricardo D. Torres
Defendant:
Armark Food and Commissary Services of the Orange County Corr. Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Tidwell et al
as 6:2014cv01470
Plaintiff:
Darry Noah Miles
Defendant:
Michael A. Tidwell and Orange County Corrections Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. ORANGE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2014cv00755
Plaintiff:
LELAND K. EDWARDS
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY JAIL and SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Aramark Food and Commissary Services of the Orange County Correctional Facility
as 1:2014cv06469
Plaintiff:
James Earl Evans
Defendant:
Aramark Food and Commissary Services of the Orange County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pavao v. Presidoo et al
as 6:2014cv01119
Plaintiff:
John Pavao
Defendant:
Officer Presidoo, Orange County Correctional Department, Officer Elise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
