Cases 111 - 120 of 4,067
Yauch v. Schuette et al
as 2:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Devin R Yauch
Defendant:
RN Schuette, Michelle and JA LaCrosse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kyle James King
Defendant:
Steven Johnson, Sgt Furgason, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollie v. Racine County Jail Medical Staff
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Dontrell Hollie
Defendant:
Racine County Jail Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooks v. Matushak et al
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Franklin Hooks
Defendant:
Rachel Matushak, James A Elsinger, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Falls v. Jerome et al
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Sherald Dante Falls
Defendant:
Waupun Correctional Institution, Dr Robert Jerome, A Panos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durley v. Kuffenkam et al
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Timothy Durley
Defendant:
Kerry L Kuffenkam and Diana L Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harden v. Vinz et al
as 2:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Kenneth V Harden
Defendant:
James Vinz, Lt Jason Russell, Waupaca County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Prosper et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Deron Darnell Love
Defendant:
Bridgette Prosper, Yanu Pusich, Warden Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Ball et al
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Leon Banks
Defendant:
Denita R Ball, John Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. McDermott et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, Mr Weber, Ms Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
