Cases 151 - 160 of 754
Hedrick v. Jividen et al
as 5:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Tanner Hedrick
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, West Virginia Department of Correction an Rehabilitation, John Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deberry v. Gary et al
as 2:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
David Deberry
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Gary, Sergeant Justin Wade, Correctional Officer Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chester v. Jividen et al.
as 2:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Chester
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Donald Ames, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friend v. Staff
as 2:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
John David Friend
Defendant:
Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Traylor v. Carothers et al
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Adrian Traylor
Defendant:
Chandra Carothers and Mrs. C. Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sandlain v. Rokosky
as 1:2022cv00379
Petitioner:
Blake Sandlain
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tidwell v. Day et al
as 2:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
David Tidwell
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Day, Sergeant Tommy Mullins, Correctional Officer Richie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Richmond et al
as 2:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Brandon Long
Defendant:
Lieutenant Chad Richmond, Captain Richard McKeen and West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. USP Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Shakeem Crawford
Defendant:
USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGraw v. McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
James Thomas McGraw
Defendant:
McDowell County Commission, Sgt. Aaron Cantrell, Corporal Nicholas Culbertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
