Cases 161 - 170 of 10,881
GIBBS v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
HENRY GIBBS, JR.
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
IN RE: COREY ROBERTS
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
COREY ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEW v. KLEMM et al
as 2:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
ULLI KLEMM, THOMAS BOLDIN and VOTE SHEET MEMBER(S) JOHN AND JANE DOE'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEW v. KLEMM
as 2:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
ULLI KLEMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIPTON v. SCHULTZ et al
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
AARON TIPTON
Defendant:
LORI SCHULTZ, ESTHER STANTON, SANDRA SIMMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. COOK and JAMAR M. COOK
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. SCUILLO et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
JAIMON TERRELL WOODS
Defendant:
OFFICER M SCUILLO, CAPTAIN T TRACEY and DEPUTY WARDEN J. PASSARELLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TOWNSEND v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
LEE TOWNSEND
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINGLETON
as 5:2024cv00381
Not Yet Classified:
AL-JALEEL SINGLETON
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY, JANINE DONATE, STEVEN MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
