Cases 171 - 180 of 5,404
MARTIN v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
BRANDON OTHA MARTIN
Defendant:
CHARLES F. BIRKHEAD, MRS. SPENCER, MRS. HOLLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Hiniger et al
as 5:2024ct03021
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Lewis Dudley
Defendant:
Damon Hiniger, Clayton Johnson, Terrence Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDuffie v. Baker et al
as 5:2024ct03042
Plaintiff:
Prentis McDuffie
Defendant:
Matthew Baker and Russell Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Primes v. Locklear
as 5:2024ct03024
Plaintiff:
James Lee Primes
Defendant:
Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsay v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 5:2024ct03050
Plaintiff:
Edward Lindsay
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution, Paula Smith, Nurse Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ishman v. Slocumb et al
as 5:2024ct03055
Plaintiff:
Bradley W. Ishman
Defendant:
Officer Slocumb, Lieutenant Thompson, Captain Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRAUVE v. UNNAMED OFFICIALS
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. SPRAUVE
Defendant:
UNNAMED OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
HECTOR R. HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, MAJOR WHITAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. YATES et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
ANTWAIN PORTER
Defendant:
OFFICER YATES and OFFICER HARGRAVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASH v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ASH
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
