Cases 181 - 190 of 7,817
King v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Edward Lavar King
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Sheryl Price, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morrison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Defendant:
J. Morrison and P. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Kinsey et al
as 2:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Demarquis Brown
Defendant:
Officer Kinsey and Sgt. Marvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Sims et al
as 4:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Allen
Defendant:
Phil Sims, Warden Addam Riddle and Bremer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britford v. McClain et al
as 7:2023cv01356
Petitioner:
Randy Earl Britford
Respondent:
Warden III Antonio McClain, Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramey v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Abraham Ramey
Defendant:
Trent Rowland, Isiea Hooper and Tammy Shamps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Sharpton et al
as 2:2023cv01347
Plaintiff:
Antwone Wilson
Defendant:
Dr. Sharpton and Yes Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. McKenzie et al
as 2:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Lionel Russell
Defendant:
Brandon McKenzie and Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. QCHC
as 5:2023cv01320
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carnell Crayton
Defendant:
QCHC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
De'Vontay Jones
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Vencini Smith, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
