Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Bridges v. Warden et al
as 7:2020cv01646
Plaintiff:
Comulus L Bridges
Defendant:
Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Governor of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00575
Defendant:
Patrica Bradley, The Medical and Health Staff, Camp Administrator Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Shawanda Nevers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00505
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Reginald Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda-Lizardi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
Anthony Miranda-Lizardi
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00278
Plaintiff:
Gregory Milton
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
Javier Rodriguez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00280
Plaintiff:
Aundra Mason
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorta-Hernandez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Saul Dorta-Hernandez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michel v. Federal Bureau of Prison FCI et al
as 7:2016cv00863
Plaintiff:
Helene Michel
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prison FCI, A. Washington-Adduci, Ella Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lugo-Velez v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv01212
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Lugo-Velez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Harrell Watts, W. T. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
