Cases 11 - 20 of 20
MAYFIELD v. OSBURN et al
as 2:2019cv00403
Defendant:
A. LEDFORD, RICHARD BROWN, ALAN HANCOCK and others
Plaintiff:
CAMERON MAYFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 1:2019cv00016
Defendant:
MELLANDER, DAVIS, CHARLES FAENZA and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRAZIER v. CARTER
as 2:2017cv00519
Defendant:
K. ALLEN, B. BENDEKOVICH, HEATHER BLASINGANE and others
Plaintiff:
JASPER L FRAZIER
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2015cv00410
Defendant:
BEVERLY GILMORE, ALAN HANCOCK, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAMON v. CRAIG et al
as 1:2014cv00428
Defendant:
ANDY CRAIG, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, VICKI MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAMON v. GARRITY et al
as 1:2013cv01740
Defendant:
JORDAN CONLEY, ANDY CRAIG, RYAN GARRITY and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv00635
Defendant:
JENIFER ADAMS, BILLY ALLAN, AMES and others
Plaintiff:
JESSIE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SISK v. OSBURN et al
as 2:2013cv00122
Defendant:
SGT. ARNOLD, OFFICER BLUE, OFFICER BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAMON v. SHEPHERD et al
as 1:2013cv00345
Defendant:
JORDAN CONLEY, ANDY CRAIG, RYAN GARRITY and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT.
as 1:2010cv01169
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT.
Plaintiff:
DAVID N. REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
