Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Amsden v. Pulaski County Jail et al
as 6:2010cv03184
Plaintiff:
Christopher Amsden
Defendant:
Pulaski County Jail, Debra Hooper, Karen Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine v. Davis, et al
as 10-1190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE DAVIS, CHRISTOPHER SYNSVOLL, MARK COLLINS and others
Stine v. Davis et al
as 1:2010cv00751
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Blake Davis, Christopher Synsvoll, Mark Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mallett v. Wiley et al
as 1:2010cv00321
Plaintiff:
Dawane Mallett
Defendant:
Ron Wiley, Mark Collins and Harly Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 10-1020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L WEINSHIENK, ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, LEWIS T. BABCOCK and others
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Robert Blackburn, Lewis T. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 09-1478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, District Director, BOYD N. BOLAND, ROBERT M. BLACKBURN and others
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 09-1198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, District Director, RON WILEY, ROBERT BAUER and others
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 09-1115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, District Director, RON WILEY, ROBERT BAUER and others
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2009cv00480
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Ron Wiley, Robert Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
