Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Kirk Loney v. Mark Sim
as 12-6568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK L. LONEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK SIMS, Officer, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity, UNKNOWN # 1, Officers, Fed. State and City, DREW, Captain, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity and others
Defendant:
DOUGLAS L. WILDER, Mayor, sued in both official and individual capacity, RODNEY MONROE, Ex-Richmond Police Chief, sued in both official and individual capacity, M. A. HARRISON, Officer, Badge #1925, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity and others
Rivers v. Northern Neck Regional Jail et al
as 2:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
Diartianan Rivers
Defendant:
Northern Neck Regional Jail and Sergeant Baserap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk Loney v. Douglas Wilder
as 10-7317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK L. LONEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. WILDER, Mayor, sued in both official and individual capacity, RODNEY MONROE, Ex-Richmond Police Chief, sued in both official and individual capacity, MARK SIMS, Officer, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity and others
Robert Reynolds v. Clarke et al
as 10-7000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN AND JANE DOE, One through Six, Northern Neck Regional Jail
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, MS. CLARKE, Northern Neck Regional Jail, NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY and others
David Meyers v. J. Frazier
as 08-8306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. FRAZIER, Superintendent of Northern Neck Regional Jail, B. GARTHRIGHT, Correctional Officer and MICHELLE LANDSMAN, Correctional Officer
Bush v. Turner et al
as 3:2007cv00710
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
Turner and Northern Neck Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
