Cases 11 - 20 of 9,641
Bobby Tatum v. Correctional Officer Hunter, et al
as 24-2088
Plaintiff:
BOBBY TATUM
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUNTER, KARL BRADFORD, sued as Lieutenant Bradford, DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden and others
Snell-Jones v. G.D.C. et al
as 6:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Zion Snell-Jones
Defendant:
G.D.C., Screven County, Screven County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Warden Bean et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Marlin D Turner
Defendant:
Warden Bean and High Desert State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin Jonassen, et al v. Bop, et al
as 24-2139
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant:
BOP, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MR. PERKINS and others
Fathiree Ali v. Stephen Adamson, et al
as 24-1540
Plaintiff:
FATHIREE UDDIN ALI
Defendant:
STEPHEN E. ADAMSON, Chaplain, DAVID M. LEACH, Special Activities Coordinator, SHANE JACKSON, Warden and others
Bobby Tatum v. Officer Criage, et al
as 24-2084
Plaintiff:
BOBBY TATUM
Defendant:
OFFICER CRIAGE, LIEUTENANT AUSTIN, DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden and others
Wright v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv05241
Plaintiff:
Courtney Wright
Defendant:
Warden Mrs. Daniels, Dentist C. Okenzie, Mrs. Hiety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marques Tavron v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-2275
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director ADC, Moses Jackson, III, Head Warden, ADC, M. Richardson, Deputy Warden, ADC and others
DaShotta/Datran Lion/Jones v. Moses Jackson, et al
as 24-2276
Plaintiff:
DaShotta/Datran Lion/Jones
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Warden/Supervisor, EARU, ADC, Christopher Johnson, Deputy Warden, Restrictive Housing (Max), EARU, ADC and Tyrone Allison, Major Restrictive Housing (Max), EARU, ADC
Brandon Burks v. Lasqubia McWilliams, et al
as 24-12015
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JAMAAL BURKS
Defendant:
LASQUBIA MCWILLIAMS, DEBBIE JONES, WARDEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
