Cases 11 - 20 of 13,619
Fairchild v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Joseph Levell Fairchild
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mark Porter
Defendant:
Zachery S Harmon, Thomas Hurst, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairchild v. Arkansas Department of Correction
as 4:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fairchild
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Waller et al
as 4:2024cv04056
Plaintiff:
Harold Steve Hale and Scooter Hale
Defendant:
Ms. Waller, Ms. Arnold and Sheriff Wayne Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Maccain
as 4:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
Maccain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Karas Correctional Health (KCH) et al
as 5:2024cv05117
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Karas Correctional Health (KCH), Sheriff Jay Cantrell, Paramedic Dustin Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Defendant:
Davis, Michael Hale, Sneed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Donald S Andrews, Jr
Defendant:
Well Path, Corrective Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Etherly et al
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Aaron T Dillard
Defendant:
Marcus Etherly, Kenyon Randle and Monicka Branscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soard v. Budnik et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Thomas Soard
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, Tasha Griffin, McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
