Cases 11 - 20 of 7,787
TAYLOR v. PLATT et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRETT TAYLOR
Defendant:
DAVID PLATT, OJO, EMMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. CENTERION CORPERATION et al
as 1:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant:
CENTERION CORPERATION, VERDON, ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOVALL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. STOVALL
Defendant:
VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. KNOX COUNTY SHERRIFF DEPT.
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
DETRIC O. DOE
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY SHERRIFF DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCROGHAM v. DUNAWAY et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES SCROGHAM
Defendant:
DUNAWAY, TEVIN TALBOT and DANGLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
OMAR DAVIS
Defendant:
MARK MURRAY and WOLKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRUDEN et al v. DAVIS
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
MYRON S. PRUDEN, MARK C.O. COOK, SHANE C. HENDRICK and others
Defendant:
W. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCROGHAM v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES SCROGHAM
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, DUNAWAY, TEVIN TALBOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK, LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv00991
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARAMARK, LLC., GEO GROUP INC, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STOVALL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. STOVALL
Defendant:
VANIHEL, BOBBIE RIGGS, BURD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
