Cases 21 - 30 of 92
RANKIN v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
LARRY KERMIT RANKIN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, LIEUTENANT MICHAEL CINKO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PEARSON v. LITTLE et al
as 3:2021cv00206
Plaintiff:
ISAAC BILAL PEARSON and ISSAC BILAL PEARSON
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, ERIC W. TICE, Sergeant WOZNIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GIBBONS v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2021cv01210
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BARRY GIBBONS
Defendant:
BICKELL, RICH KUSTENBAUDER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PENDLETON vs. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL
as 3:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDANT ERIC W. TICE and DAN CARO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BANKS v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00144
Plaintiff:
DONALD BANKS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, E. Tice, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNG v. LAFFERTY et al
as 3:2021cv00078
Defendant:
DR. M. THOMPSON, DR. SMUCKER, KIERRA LAFFERTY and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNKIN v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00076
Defendant:
NURSE KELLY STEWART, SUPERINTENDANT ERIC TICE, MEDICAL DIRECTOR BRIAN HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. YOUNKIN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MYERS v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D. MYERS
Defendant:
KANSKY DELISMA and ERIC TICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tice v. Burke County (Detention Center) et al
as 1:2021cv00066
Plaintiff:
Chevy Vann Tice
Defendant:
Burke County (Detention Center) and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
