Cases 31 - 40 of 196
Prado v. Jackson County Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv00258
Plaintiff:
Saili Prado
Defendant:
Jackson County Missouri and John Doe I and II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelums v. Newton County, Missouri et al
as 3:2021cv05036
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Cecil Nelums
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Newton County, Missouri, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Jackson County, Missouri et al
as 4:2021cv00230
Defendant:
Jackson County, Missouri, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Brian T Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erwin v. Barry County, Missouri et al
as 3:2021cv05030
Defendant:
Barry County, Missouri, John Doe I, Clinton Bray and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Erwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller-Bey v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00272
Defendant:
Van Loo, Brock Van Loo, MD John Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Hilary B Miller-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller-Bey v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv04027
Defendant:
Van Loo, Brock Van Loo, Jane Wheeler and others
Plaintiff:
Hilary B Miller-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Precythe et al
as 5:2021cv06019
Defendant:
John Shirrell, Elizabeth Atterberry, John Tucker and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson E Hopkins, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker et al v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv03357
Defendant:
Phillippe, Robert Hopping, Ipoc and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sego, Richard Benedict, Jerry L Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Jackson County et al
as 4:2020cv00621
Defendant:
Toney Manuel, Terrance Dooley, Jr., John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Rashaud Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Senger et al
as 6:2020cv03217
Defendant:
Mr. Jay Senger, Jimmie Russell and Taney County
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
