Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Dennis Hohol v. Cathy Jess, et al
as 10-1280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS L. HOHOL
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHY JESS, MICHAEL BECK, AMY SMITH and others
Means v. Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility et al
as 1:2009cv00744
Plaintiff:
Jerry Means
Defendant:
Milwaukee Secure Detention Facility, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Ronald Benisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Eagleton et al
as 9:2009cv01490
Plaintiff:
James P Moody, Jr
Defendant:
Willie Eagleton, Michael Beinor, Kimberly C Gastin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Moody v. Eagleton et al
as 9:2009cv01480
Plaintiff:
James P Moody, Jr
Defendant:
Willie Eagleton, Michael Beinor, Kimberly C Gastin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mabra v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2008cv00475
Plaintiff:
Monte R Mabra
Defendant:
Gonzales, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Barbara Framer Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Buford v. Pollard et al
as 1:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Donald Buford
Defendant:
William Pollard, Michael Baenen, Peter Ericksen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Irby v. Smith et al
as 2:2008cv00258
Plaintiff:
Leon Irby
Defendant:
Amy Smith, Welcome F Rose, Michael S Thurmer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Pickle et al
as 2:2007cv01157
Plaintiff:
Manuel Williams
Defendant:
Officer Pickle, Officer Fullmer, Officer Kazick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hohol v. Jess et al
as 2:2007cv01004
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Hohol
Defendant:
Cathy Jess, Michael Beck, Amy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxton v. Redfeorn et al
as 0:2007cv01035
Plaintiff:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Defendant:
Ethel Redfeorn, Amy Smith, P Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
