Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Beatty v. Harry et al
as 4:2020cv00149
Plaintiff:
Rodney N. Beatty
Defendant:
Rodney Carberry, Laurel Harry, DOC Health Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCICCHITANO v. DOC SCI ALBION et al
as 2:2020cv00006
Defendant:
DOC SCI ALBION, CHRISTOPHER MEURE and SUPERINTENDANT MICHAEL CLARK
Plaintiff:
ANTHONEY J. SCICCHITANO, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOUSER v. WIDENOUR et al
as 2:2016cv01039
Defendant:
WETZEL, DR. JIN, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
HOUSER and DARIEN HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PEARSON v. NOEL et al
as 2:2019cv00177
Plaintiff:
RICKY PEARSON
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, ROBERT GILMORE, MR. HAMMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SNIDER v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00735
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, NEDRA GREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MEEKINS v. DOC's GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAZZ MEEKINS
Defendant:
DOC's GRATERFORD, JOHN AND JANE DOE, J. HAWK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. FRAZIER et al
as 3:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL FRAZIER, UNKNOWN NAMED REGIONAL DIRECTOR, Baltazar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. FRAZIER et al
as 2:2017cv01540
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL FRAZIER, UNKNOWN NAMED REGIONAL DIRECTOR, BALTAZAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
HOYE v. SCI GREENE MAIL ROOM DEPARTMENT OF DOC et al
as 2:2017cv00451
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HOYE
Defendant:
SCI GREENE MAIL ROOM DEPARTMENT OF DOC and SCI GRATERFORD MAIL ROOM DEPT OF DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. DOC HOUTZDALE et al
as 3:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARDS
Defendant:
DOC HOUTZDALE, JOYNER and SHERYL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
