Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Sanchez v. Hooks et al
as 5:2019ct03144
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks and Kenneth E. Lassiter
Plaintiff:
Carlos E. Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villanueva v. Thornton et al
as 5:2019ct03163
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Gutierrez Villanueva
Defendant:
Kenneth E. Lassiter and Cynthia Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2019ct03074
Defendant:
Ina M. Hinton, Chaplain Hardison, Kenneth E. Lassiter and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARMONA v. NC HEALTH DEPARTMENT FOR PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00566
Defendant:
JOSEPH VALLIERE, NC HEALTH DEPARTMENT FOR PRISONS and KENNETH E. LASSITER
Plaintiff:
JASON CARMONA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY et al
as 1:2019cv00517
Defendant:
KENNETH W. DIGGS, JACK CLELLAND, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL TRISTAN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2019cv00444
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, SGT. CAMERON E. GADDY, LIEUTENANT KAREN HENDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
HARRIS EMANUEL FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Hooks et al
as 5:2019ct03094
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks, Reuben F. Young, Kenneth E. Lassiter and others
Plaintiff:
Hassume S. Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2019ct03085
Plaintiff:
Eddricco L. Brown
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks, State of North Carolina and Kenneth E. Lassiter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OXENDINE v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2018cv01002
Defendant:
CHARLES CHAVIS, WENDAL LOCKLEAR, KENNETH E. LASSITER and others
Plaintiff:
TONY OXENDINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2018cv00938
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER ALMOND, ERIC A. HOOKS, KENNETH E. LASSITER and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER EARL COLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
