Cases 31 - 40 of 42
MOON v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2014cv00067
Defendant:
R. BASKERVILLE, BEAVER, J. BEIGHLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NEAL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv00188
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, STEPHEN COPE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
NEAL v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2012cv00298
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, CHARLES L. LOCKETT, AMBER L. NELSON and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
NEAL v. KANE
as 1:2012cv01212
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. NEAL
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00101
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, CHRISTOPHER A. GREINER and others
Interested Party:
JO ANN BARNHART and LONNIE G. SCHMIDT
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jesus Robles v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 12-11464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS ROBLES
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS R. KANE, BOP, in his individual and official capacities, THE GEO GROUP and others
MOON v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00072
Defendant:
V. BOYER, LIEUTENANT BRACE, HARVEY G. CHURCH and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL WESLEY MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NEAL v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00040
Defendant:
F TIMOTHY COLEMAN, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robles v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jesus Robles
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Thomas R. Kane, The GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Davis et al
as 1:2011cv02721
Plaintiff:
Bruce W. Jones
Defendant:
Blake (I) Davis, Blake Davis, Julie (I) Wands and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
