Cases 41 - 50 of 248
Burton v. Rankin County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2021cv00439
Defendant:
Rankin County Circuit Court and William R. Labarre
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Walter Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Winston et al
as 3:2021cv00430
Defendant:
Officer Riel, Officer Chapman, Officer Jordan and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jimmiemac Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McRoberts (ID 117607) v. Fikes et al
as 5:2021cv03141
Defendant:
Hope Fikes and Jason Rankin
Plaintiff:
Anthony McRoberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Ball et al
as 1:2021cv00151
Defendant:
FNU McPherson, Mike Slayer, FNU Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Ball et al
as 5:2021ct03153
Defendant:
Warden Mike Slayer, Ms. Georgi, P.A. Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Medical Private Contractor
as 5:2021ct03095
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Defendant:
Medical Private Contractor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Coles County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2021cv02057
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cox
Defendant:
James Rankin and Coles County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Singleton et al
as 5:2021ct03059
Defendant:
Warden Hankins, Capt. Pittman, Warden Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin Bey v. Singleton et al
as 5:2021ct03040
Defendant:
Warden Shanticia Hawkins, Unit Manager Mullian, Assist. Warden Shirley Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston v. Rankin County /State of Mississippi
as 3:2021cv00045
Defendant:
Rankin County /State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Christopher Winston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
