Cases 41 - 50 of 201
RICHARDSON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
KEITH RICHARDSON
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, ADAM SMITH and RICH FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FlAHERTY v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
HERBERT KEVIN FlAHERTY
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, ADAM SMITH and RICH FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
RALPH OMAR WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, DEPUTY WARDEN ADAM SMITH and COUNTY EXECUTIVE RICH FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BICKHAM v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH ANTHRIN BICKHAM and ISAIAH BICKHAM
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO L. HARPER, DEPUTY WARDEN ADAM SMITH and MAJOR EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CEASAR v. VARNER et al
as 1:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
DIMITRIC CEASAR
Defendant:
D. VARNER, KERRI MOORE, T. BIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MORGAN v. COUNTY OF FAYETTE et al
as 2:2021cv01340
Plaintiff:
ADAM E. MORGAN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF FAYETTE, JOHN LANKEY, ANGELA KERN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOHNSON et al v. CLAYHURST et al
as 2:2021cv04156
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON, LESSIE POWELL, RASHID POWELL and others
Defendant:
HAROLD CLAYHURST, JILL BRADY, GORDON GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHELLER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01169
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SCHELLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, KARAN FEATHER, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MARTIN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01120
Plaintiff:
QUINTON MARTIN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, KARAN FEATHER, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
