Cases 41 - 50 of 65
BEST v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv01688
Plaintiff:
ALVIN M. BEST
Defendant:
LENA BURROWS, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 2:2016cv00263
Defendant:
ANONYMOUS, B.S.N., ANONYMOUS, D.O.N., ANONYMOUS, M.D. #1 and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABDULLAH v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH IBN ABDULLAH
Defendant:
JACK HENDRIX, ELESHA HIDALGO, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MENDEZ v. PARKHURST et al
as 1:2014cv01838
Plaintiff:
JACOB MENDEZ
Defendant:
ODELL, R. PARKHURST and BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2014cv00226
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY COOPER
Defendant:
C. FIELDKAMP, CHUCK PENFOLD, BRIAN SMITH and others
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARPER v. SMITH
as 1:2014cv00745
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HARPER
Defendant:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2014cv00579
Plaintiff:
LAMAR DONTAE ALLEN
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, BRIAN SMITH and VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MENDEZ v. PARKHURST et al
as 1:2014cv00163
Plaintiff:
JACOB MENDEZ
Defendant:
ODELL, R. PARKHURST and BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES
as 1:2014cv00094
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, CORK, DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD v. JOSEPH et al
as 1:2013cv01883
Defendant:
JENNIFER BARNES, CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, LOLITE JOSEPH and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND WOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
