Cases 41 - 50 of 227
Zirko v. Hansen
as 1:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Steven L Zirko
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Tilden et al
as 3:2022cv02372
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brown
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, Cheryle Hansen, Dr. Ritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brent v. Hansen et al
as 1:2022cv01339
Plaintiff:
Michael Brent
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen and Nicki Rambo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villavicencio Serna v. Marick et al
as 1:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Luis Villavicencio Serna
Defendant:
. Marick, . Cox, Lt. . Torrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barghouti v. Hansen et al
as 1:2022cv01305
Plaintiff:
Eiad Barghouti
Defendant:
Cheryl Hansen, R Ojelade, . Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Tomes v. Cheron T. Nash et al
as 1:2022cv01140
Plaintiff:
John Tomes
Defendant:
Cheron T. Nash, Talladega FCI and Lela Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Wexford Health Source Inc et al
as 1:2022cv01237
Plaintiff:
Steven Curry
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc, Henry Tilden, Nikki Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kohn v. Meyers et al
as 1:2022cv01699
Plaintiff:
Travis Kohn
Defendant:
Desirae Meyers, Rosalinda Melchi, Linda Doyle-Limmer and others
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER FOR Travis Kohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montanez v. Tilden et al
as 1:2022cv01177
Plaintiff:
Pierre A Montanez
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, Cheryl Hansen, Nikki Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Tilden et al
as 1:2022cv01167
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brown
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, Cheryle Hansen, Dr. . Ritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
