Cases 41 - 50 of 54
SULLIVAN v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2012cv05189
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, DELANCY, MAY and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LEWIS SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEARSALL v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2012cv04878
Plaintiff:
ARDMMIR PEARSALL
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY, JOHN DOE MEDICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBLES v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2012cv00985
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ROBLES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, PRISON BOARD INSPECTOR, JULIO M. ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLASSENGALE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv03006
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE BLASSENGALE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JANICE FEDARCYKE, BRIAN PACCHIOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIVINGSTON v. JOHN DOE APPEL et al
as 2:2011cv02764
Plaintiff:
ANDRE LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE APPEL , JOHN DOE'S & JANE DOE'S, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURRETT v. RUSTIN et al
as 2:2010cv01513
Plaintiff:
COREY DURRETT
Defendant:
RAMON RUSTIN, DANA PHILLIPS, DR. PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart vs. Varano et al
as 1:2010cv01701
Plaintiff:
Carl T. Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
David A. Varano, Ronda Ellett, Robert McMillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. VARANO et al
as 2:2010cv03845
Plaintiff:
CARL T. STEWART, JR.
Defendant:
DAVID A. VARANO, RONDA ELLETT, ROBERT MCMILLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2010cv01105
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. TAYLOR
Defendant:
EDWARD RENDELL, JEFFERY A. BEARD, DAVIE DEGUGLEILMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRICKER v. BRITTON et al
as 3:2009cv00293
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant:
RANDALL E. BRITTON, MARY JO BARBER, SARGENT NEWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
