Cases 41 - 50 of 599
THOMPSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, JOSEPH MCCUTCHEONS, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHENS v. MCMANN et al
as 1:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEPHENS
Defendant:
OFFICER MCMANN, CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS, SGT. ETHRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNETT v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01421
Plaintiff:
DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, REAGLE, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Not Classified By Court:
GREGORY LAKER, CONNER DICKERSON and MARK SNIDERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. KALLIE et al
as 2:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
MARK B. JOHNSON
Defendant:
S. KALLIE, GEO GROUP, LIEUTENANT CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 1:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
DERRICK CHARLES LEAUNDRE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEITH v. IN DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv01334
Plaintiff:
REESE KEITH
Defendant:
IN DEPT. OF CORRECTION, JACK HENDRIX and WILLIAM WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRACKEN v. KIRBY et al
as 2:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
KIRBY, HENSLEY and WILLIAM HYATTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv01283
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. HENDERSON
Defendant:
REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. I.D.O.C. MEDICAL et al
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
ZECHARIAH B. JAMES
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. MEDICAL, MENTAL HEALTH STAFF DEPARTMENT, MEDICAL COMPANY P.C.F. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
