Cases 51 - 60 of 431
HAYDEN v. MADISON COUNTY JAIL COMMANDER et al
as 1:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HAYDEN
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY JAIL COMMANDER, MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF, MADISON COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENSLEY v. MADISON COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN HENSLEY
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY, MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MADISON COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOUYE JR v. DOE'S
as 1:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD DEAN BOUYE JR
Defendant:
JOHN'S AND JANE'S DOE'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNSER v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LEE UNSER
Defendant:
DAVID WEDDING, WOODS, BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. JONES et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
JAMA JONES, MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. JOSEPH et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE
Defendant:
SAMMIE JOSEPH, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (IDOC), R. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SILVERS v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
KERRY E. SILVERS
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. DOE #1 et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
NARVEL WHITFIELD
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGLOSSON v. BALLARD et al
as 2:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MCGLOSSON
Defendant:
J. BALLARD and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PAYNE v. VANIHEL et al
as 1:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
NICK PAYNE
Defendant:
VANIHEL, MCCONNELLY, REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
