Cases 61 - 70 of 150
Lyles v. Sterling et al
as 9:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
Courtney Lyles
Defendant:
Bryan Sterling, Michael McCall, NFN Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. McCall et al
as 1:2016cv03653
Plaintiff:
Douglas Green
Defendant:
Michael McCall and Sandra Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Supreme Raheem Ackbar v. Lieutenant McPherson
as 16-7391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT MCPHERSON and SERGEANT BOGERSRODE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCCALL, SERGEANT BOGASTROKE, OFFICER MCCANTS and others
English v. Livingstone et al
as 1:2016cv02985
Plaintiff:
Roderick Jerome English
Defendant:
Cpt. Livingstone, Sgt. Walker, Warden Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnnie Frazier v. Lt. June
as 16-6677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNIE FRAZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. JUNE, OFFICER MARTINEZ, LT. KIRKLAND and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCCALL, Dir. of Programs, OFC. HUNTER, SERGEANT WILLIAMS and others
Watkins v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv01069
Plaintiff:
Sammy Keith Watkins
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Brian Sterling, Michael McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClellan v. Haley et al
as 9:2016cv00949
Plaintiff:
James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Nikki R Haley and Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv00905
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ware
Defendant:
Betty Smith, Mr Samual, Mr Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyke v. Mackie et al
as 6:2016cv00279
Plaintiff:
Roger Allen Dyke
Defendant:
Bernard Mackie, Michael McCall, Larry Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burden v. Spartanburg Housing Authority et al
as 0:2015cv04728
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond Burden
Defendant:
Spartanburg Housing Authority, Nathan Bragg and Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
